{"id":4062,"date":"2008-03-07T18:38:21","date_gmt":"2008-03-07T10:38:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danwei.webfactional.com\/?p=4062"},"modified":"2008-03-07T18:38:21","modified_gmt":"2008-03-07T10:38:21","slug":"tang_wei_too_hot_for_tv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/media-regulation\/tang_wei_too_hot_for_tv.php","title":{"rendered":"Tang Wei too hot for TV"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"imgleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"JDM080307tangwei.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.laodanwei.org\/2008\/03\/07\/JDM080307tangwei.jpg\" width=\"160\" height=\"155\" class=\"mt-image-left\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"CaptionStyle\" style=\"width: 160px;\">Someone has to take the fall<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Last month Tang Wei shot a 30-second <a href=\"http:\/\/v.youku.com\/v_show\/id_cl00XMTk2ODA3MjA=.html\">TV commercial<\/a> for Ponds for which she was reportedly paid 6 million yuan. That&#8217;s not looking like such a smart investment now that the commercial has been pulled from television and the <i>Lust, Caution<\/i> star is said to be banned from the mainland media.<\/p>\n<p>According to the <i>Beijing Morning Post<\/i>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>This reporter made calls to a number of major TV stations in Beijing and Shanghai, whose employees confirmed that they had pulled the Tang Wei advertisements. However, they said that they were only acting at <acronym title=\"State Administration of Radio Film and TV\">SARFT<\/acronym>&#8216;s request. Reportedly, the stations received an order yesterday banning them from promoting Tang Wei in any form, including commercials featuring her as a spokesperson. However, most of the employees said that they had only heard about the ban from their leaders at staff meetings; they had not seen the document with their own eyes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>No reason was given, nor was Tang Wei&#8217;s manager Cindy able to provide any information, so the Internet and print media were free to speculate on just what it was about Tang Wei that had upset the authorities.<\/p>\n<p>The film itself had been the subject of controversy, with some critics accusing it of <a href=\"http:\/\/zonaeuropa.com\/200711b.brief.htm#008\">glorifying traitors<\/a>. But it would be odd\u2014even for SARFT\u2014to punish an actor for that complaint. Speaking about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.laodanwei.org\/media_regulation\/lost_in_beijing_finally_gets_k.php\">recent ban<\/a> on <i>Lost in Beijing<\/i>, film censor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.laodanwei.org\/magazines\/state_of_the_film_industry.php\">Zheng Dongtian<\/a> said: &#8220;When punishing a film, we&#8217;ll never punish the actors.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Netizen dlm7882, who noticed that all <i>Lust, Caution<\/i> videos had been pulled from Youku (the title also pulls up zero results on Tudou and nothing relevant on 6 Rooms), wrote the following (taken from a Tianya repost):<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I just learned that SARFT has issued a notice banning any form of promotion, including print news, photos, and video, for Tang Wei, with the threat of severe punishment. I don&#8217;t know what you all think of this action by SARFT, but I am truly mystified.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t like Tang Wei at all, but I&#8217;ll grant that her performance in that movie deserves affirmation. Overseas actors wouldn&#8217;t give a second thought to that sort of thing, but because all kinds of problems in China, including the lack of a ratings system, Tang Wei has become a magnet for criticism. This is not fair at all. Look at how SARFT leader <a href=\"http:\/\/news.imagethief.com\/blogs\/china\/archive\/2008\/03\/05\/movie-ratings-will-put-china-on-the-express-train-to-pornoville-official.aspx\">explain<\/a> why they won&#8217;t set up a ratings system\u2014what ludicrous idiocy! The art of cinema is castrated once it arrives in China.<\/p>\n<p>Coincidentally, I just watched Lou Ye&#8217;s <i>Summer Palace<\/i> and saw Hao Lei&#8217;s performance, which exceeded Tang Wei&#8217;s in every way. This too was a shock: it&#8217;s not easy for a Chinese actress to be so open. I don&#8217;t say this to encourage actresses to shed their clothes, but rather because I think we ought to learn how to appreciate the performances they offer from the perspective of pure cinema rather than through dirty thoughts.<\/p>\n<p>Reportedly, Ang Lee has turned up in Xinhua&#8217;s Internal Reference and is now on the blacklist. To some degree, one could explain a ban on Ang Lee through his lack of concern for China&#8217;s moral boundaries, but what&#8217;s the point of banning Tang Wei? Are people jealous of her popularity? Those jealous people should go strip then, if they&#8217;ve got the guts.<\/p>\n<p>Under this kind of ban, will the people took part in the filming of <i>Lust, Caution<\/i> be banned as well? If they aren&#8217;t, then was an actress banned simply because she dared to shed her clothes on screen? If it comes out that this is the reason, what a disgrace it will be for both SARFT and Chinese cinema! When the shooting and screening of a film becomes solely a matter of politics, when it is nothing more than a tool in the hands of people trading money for power, is there any way for such a county&#8217;s film industry to move forward?<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, from Tang Wei&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s all good: at least she can rest a little. No one will come to interview her now, I&#8217;d guess\u2014they won&#8217;t be able to publish anything, anyway.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Coincidentally, just yesterday the mainland media reported that viewers were complaining about a shampoo ad campaign featuring Cecilia Cheung, the Hong Kong actress who was a major figure in Edison Chen&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/zonaeuropa.com\/20080209_1.htm\">pornographic photo scandal<\/a>. According to the <i>Chongqing Economic Times<\/i>, viewers were concerned that Cheung&#8217;s reputation would cause undue harm to children who happened to see the commercial.<\/p>\n<div class=\"lshead\">Links and Sources<\/div>\n<div class=\"lstext\">\n<ul>\n<li><i>Beijing Morning Post<\/i> (Chinese): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.morningpost.com.cn\/bjcb\/html\/2008-03\/07\/content_55153.htm\">Commercial pulled; Tang Wei may be banned from TV<\/a><\/li>\n<li><i>Beijing Evening News<\/i> via Beijing WW (Chinese): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beijingww.com\/5\/2008\/03\/07\/182@51542.htm\">Tang Wei ad plays for a few days and then pulled<\/a><\/li>\n<li><i>Chongqing Economic Times<\/i> via Xinhuanet (Chinese): <a href=\"http:\/\/news.xinhuanet.com\/newmedia\/2008-03\/07\/content_7738015.htm\">Audience complains about Cecilia Cheung commercial<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Tianya movie forum (Chinese): <a href=\"http:\/\/cache.tianya.cn\/publicforum\/content\/filmtv\/1\/219102.shtml\">dlm7882 on <i>Lust, Caution<\/i> ban<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Earlier on Danwei: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.laodanwei.org\/media_regulation\/lost_in_beijing_finally_gets_k.php\">Lost in Beijing finally gets killed<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tang Wei (\u6c64\u552f) possibly banned from TV by prudish regulators.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/media-regulation\/tang_wei_too_hot_for_tv.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[173],"tags":[1965,169,1966],"class_list":["post-4062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media-regulation","tag-lust-caution","tag-sarft","tag-tang-wei"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4062\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laodanwei.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}